ADMIX Gear at NAMM 2018 Soft Cases For Lighting Photography & More.Like many of you, my first computer was an Apple. Home Guidelines PC VS MAC THE BEST LAPTOP OR COMPUTER FOR EDITING Photographer’s Guide PC VS MAC THE BEST LAPTOP OR COMPUTER FOR EDITING Photographer’s Guide FebruJohn Guidelines 36. Hardware, software, operating system, cost, design/aesthetics. Choosing one platform over the other can be a difficult choice because there are so many different aspects and variables to consider. Because I write about digital photography I must use both PCs and Macs so that I can deliver balanced stories and explain computer functions to our entire audience, not just one group or the other.When it comes to photo editing, both PC and Mac platforms can be very powerful and highly capable, with each having its own list of pros and cons.Operating like a standard 35mm camera. But I own—and use—not one but three Macs, and I never travel without my MacBook Air.Mac. In fact, it’s been consistently ranked the best free photo editor for Mac, or close to it, since not long after its debut in 1996().If it will make you PC advocates feel any better, this article—along with about 95% of everything else I write—is being started on a PC running Windows 8.1, a very reliable platform despite what its distracters say. Why we love it: GIMP short for GNU Image Manipulation Program has long been a contender for the best free image editor. Of course, there weren’t many other choices back then.Where you can use it: Browsers for Mac, Windows, Linux.Professionals especially, because even business expenses cannot go unbridled. I’ve gathered some pretty interesting answers, although many of the reasons are more emotional than rational.So which is better for digital photography: Mac or PC? It all depends on the following considerations.For all of us except the very rich, there is an upper limit to how much we can spend on photographic equipment. I delight in asking Mac users—and PC users—why their computer is best for Photoshop, editing video and so forth. And for some strange reason I never confuse the keyboard commands, so I can and do move seamlessly from one platform to the other. I can be happy with my Macs and equally at home with PCs. So you might say that I’m whatever the computer equivalent of being bilingual is.
![]() Best For Photography Windows Or Mac Platforms CanBut in the final analysis, Macs win this round, even with one mouse tied behind their back.Running on identically equipped machines, does the Mac version of an application outperform the Windows version, or is it the other way around? Or are they essentially the same? To find out I asked someone who knows about these things. While most Win-only photo-related software products run smoothly on a Mac under Parallels, Boot Camp or a similar utility (Corel PaintShop Pro X7 Ultimate comes to mind as an example), in some instances certain features are not fully implemented. End of story.Well, not quite. The impact of this fact can be dismissed via rationalization, e.g., you get what you pay for nonetheless, if you want to maximize your budget, Macs are probably not the way to go.A Mac can be coaxed to run nearly every Windows application but a Win PC cannot run Mac software. Malwarebytes 30 for macWe’re not talking about hard drive malfunctions—unfortunately, HDD problems are platform agnostic and essentially inevitable. But I’m getting ahead of myself.Macs crash about as often as the rules of chess change. To speculate, that could also be one reason why Macs seem more stable than PCs. “I’ve seen Macs with less resources outperform some really powerful PCs.”Makes sense to me. “Software developers have better development tools available to them to build better performing apps on the Apple platform,” he said. Save money and install only the best parts and accessories. We can debate the argument about their immunity another time for now, accept my warning that Macs can get viruses and take proper precautions.Perhaps this is of little or no importance to most photographers, you can DIY a PC from readily available components and create an awesome photo editing machine. They seem to be more resistant to malware, too, but don’t let their long run of good fortune in the Virus Wars lull you into a sense of false security. Macs are notoriously easy to configure—without sacrificing options. Instability undermines efficient workflow and can even mean lost revenue for a photo pro.I wish I had a dollar for every time I heard an Apple user ebulliently exclaim how easy it was to set up their Mac, connect to a network or transparently find a printer driver. Either platform can access the Cloud to store or share images, contracts and other files. But you cannot build a Mac, or any sort of clone capable of running Mac software.Conventional wisdom might give Macs the edge when it comes to mobile compatibility, but for photographers, PCs are just as competent. Rolling your own is fun and simpler than most realize. Thunderbolt 2, for instance, delivers throughput of up to 20Gb/s to each external device. The Mac Pro Desktop, for example, relies almost entirely on external hard drives and does so without sacrificing anything. IOS battle, so we’ll call this campaign a draw.Connectivity—USB, Thunderbolt, HDMI and the Next Fast ThingApple has always been at the forefront of connectivity solutions. With the arrival of the 27-inch iMac with Retina 5K display and its 5120 x 2880 native resolution, Apple took the crown in this category and it’s unlikely that anyone will ever dethrone them.Identically equipped computer systems running the same software should perform with equal speed and facility. For many photographers, a modern, healthy iMac is all the image processing engine they’ll ever need. Connection speed equals improved productivity.It’s hard to find an integrated (spelled all-in-one) computer better than an iMac. Does this matter to photographers? Those of us who work with large batches of large image files say yes. Macs resist being opened, for the most part, except to add RAM. Heavy-duty users can find equal happiness with either system.On one hand, it’s child’s play to open a PC box and install a drive, graphics card or I/O board. I’ve heard Mac users swear up and down that it’s easier to edit video on a Mac, but none have ever proven it to my satisfaction—except for the very basic editing that beginners perform with the video editor that comes bundled on their MacBook. But PC users are not necessarily buttoned down, office cubicle types. Apple has done an incredible job of painting the typical Mac user as being more hip, more creative and more of a rule-breaker. If one system or the other has an advantage, be it ever so slight, it’s the PC.Admit it. Unless you foresee the need and inclination to make frequent changes to your computer’s mechanics, this is probably a moot point for most photographers. But you can daisy chain a nearly endless string of fast, easily swappable external drives to a Mac Pro Desktop. Or maybe it’s just that PC owners like to whine and complain more. For sure I can say that Mac users tend to be happier with their systems overall compared to PC users. Now, if you could only buy hot PCs at the Apple Store, then we’d have the best of all possible worlds.Usually both and sometimes neither. As for me, I have no choice, I must use both.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorSarah ArchivesCategories |